Early last year, Purdue University, one of the nation’s prestigious land grant institutions, announced that it had purchased Kaplan University from Kaplan Inc. This week the university announced that the new entity will be called Purdue University Global. But will this new institution be able to overcome the controversies that have plagued its existence from the start?
Reactions to the Initial Announcement
When announced last April, Purdue University’s acquisition of Kaplan came as a surprise to many and angered some stakeholders. The unprecedented acquisition was orchestrated by Purdue University’s current president, Mitch Daniels, a former Republican governor. For at least some Purdue faculty, the move appeared to be nothing more than an attempt to undermine the university’s commitment to public education, but Daniels disagreed, arguing that the move was in keeping with the university’s Land Grant mission. At the time of the announcement, Daniels was clear that the acquisition was also directly tied to Purdue’s desire to expand its online course and program offerings.
As part of the deal, Purdue acquired Kaplan’s operations and all of its assets, including more than a dozen campuses and an estimated 30,000 students and 3,000 employees. Following the announcement, however, the new project received especially harsh feedback from Purdue faculty members. The Indiana Conference of the American Association of University Professors, which represents Purdue faculty, has been especially critical.
What We Know about Purdue University Global
In a press release issued this morning, Purdue indicated that Purdue University Global (the chosen name for the new entity) is set to get the green light by Feb. 22. The university’s press release noted that the Indiana Commission for Higher Education had already voted unanimously to approve the acquisition in August and that the U.S. Department of Education gave its approval in September but with a stipulation that the new institution’s name include the name Purdue.
President Mitch Daniels, who continues to spearhead the project, was predictably enthusiastic, explaining, “Our campuses are typically named after the physical locations where they hold classes. Purdue University Global can be accessed from anywhere in the world, at any time. The name proved appealing and meaningful to our various stakeholders – most importantly prospective students.”
As part of the acquisition, Daniels will also be acquiring a new colleague. As reported this morning in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Betty Vandenbosch, president of Kaplan University, will become chancellor of the new entity known as Purdue University Global.
Hey Hillary,
Great article, I think that the modern parent, who is indeed a “digital native” – one born around the 1980s, is looking for a bit of reassurance that they are not damaging their child by allowing them to use screens. Do you think we’ll see evidence of this soon?
Best wishes,
John
Hi John,
That’s an interesting question! The prevailing theory suggests that, like most things in life, moderation is key. There’s no hard evidence to suggest that allowing children to use age-appropriate technology in small doses is harmful to their development. In fact, when parents participate in digital activities along with their children and provide guided interaction about how the activities on a screen connect with the real world, it can be a great opportunity for learning. (University of Edinburgh professor Lydia Plowman expands on this concept in an article from BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/z3tsyrd)
Of course, screen time should never be a replacement for human interaction, physical activity, or any of the other cornerstones of a child’s development. But — at least in my opinion — we’ll soon see more evidence that limited, structured engagement with screens is actually more beneficial than, say, passively watching television (like many in our generation often did!).
All the best,
Hillary
[…] Miller, H. (2017). The myth of the “digital native” generation [Image]. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]
[…] Miller, H. (2017). The myth of the “digital native” generation [Image]. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]
[…] Miller, H. (2017). The myth of the “digital native” generation [Image]. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]
[…] devices, and systems become more common, learners have to be more plastic and adaptive. While digital natives do not necessarily have more knowledge than older generations, the ability to learn something new […]
[…] Miller, H. (2017, August 8). The Myth Of The “Digital Native” Generation. ELearningInside News. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]