Great article, I think that the modern parent, who is indeed a “digital native” – one born around the 1980s, is looking for a bit of reassurance that they are not damaging their child by allowing them to use screens. Do you think we’ll see evidence of this soon?
That’s an interesting question! The prevailing theory suggests that, like most things in life, moderation is key. There’s no hard evidence to suggest that allowing children to use age-appropriate technology in small doses is harmful to their development. In fact, when parents participate in digital activities along with their children and provide guided interaction about how the activities on a screen connect with the real world, it can be a great opportunity for learning. (University of Edinburgh professor Lydia Plowman expands on this concept in an article from BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/z3tsyrd)
Of course, screen time should never be a replacement for human interaction, physical activity, or any of the other cornerstones of a child’s development. But — at least in my opinion — we’ll soon see more evidence that limited, structured engagement with screens is actually more beneficial than, say, passively watching television (like many in our generation often did!).
[…] devices, and systems become more common, learners have to be more plastic and adaptive. While digital natives do not necessarily have more knowledge than older generations, the ability to learn something new […]
Hey Hillary,
Great article, I think that the modern parent, who is indeed a “digital native” – one born around the 1980s, is looking for a bit of reassurance that they are not damaging their child by allowing them to use screens. Do you think we’ll see evidence of this soon?
Best wishes,
John
Hi John,
That’s an interesting question! The prevailing theory suggests that, like most things in life, moderation is key. There’s no hard evidence to suggest that allowing children to use age-appropriate technology in small doses is harmful to their development. In fact, when parents participate in digital activities along with their children and provide guided interaction about how the activities on a screen connect with the real world, it can be a great opportunity for learning. (University of Edinburgh professor Lydia Plowman expands on this concept in an article from BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/z3tsyrd)
Of course, screen time should never be a replacement for human interaction, physical activity, or any of the other cornerstones of a child’s development. But — at least in my opinion — we’ll soon see more evidence that limited, structured engagement with screens is actually more beneficial than, say, passively watching television (like many in our generation often did!).
All the best,
Hillary
[…] Miller, H. (2017). The myth of the “digital native” generation [Image]. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]
[…] Miller, H. (2017). The myth of the “digital native” generation [Image]. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]
[…] Miller, H. (2017). The myth of the “digital native” generation [Image]. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]
[…] devices, and systems become more common, learners have to be more plastic and adaptive. While digital natives do not necessarily have more knowledge than older generations, the ability to learn something new […]
[…] Miller, H. (2017, August 8). The Myth Of The “Digital Native” Generation. ELearningInside News. https://news.elearninginside.com/myth-digital-native-generation/ […]