Articles
Higher Education
ASU’s REMOTE Is Bringing Educators Together to Help Prepare For an Uncertain Fall
By Henry Kronk
June 17, 2020
In the last days of March, it became increasingly clear to ASU Entrepreneur in Residence David Levin (former CEO of McGraw-Hill Education) that the COVID-19 pandemic wasn’t just a world health crisis. It also posed a critical threat to virtually every education system. On April 4, he approached Arizona State University (ASU) President Michael Crow with an idea. Levin wanted to host a virtual conference for educators to help share best online learning practices, troubleshoot common hard and soft issues, and help stakeholders navigate a wholly uncertain future. The result of Levin’s efforts, REMOTE, will occur on July 13 and 14. Educators wishing to attend can register for free.
“Most students are familiar with the ‘sage on a stage’ model of teaching,” Levin said over the phone. “That suddenly got replaced by ‘sage on Zoom.’ Neither are the best way of doing things. The best of online programs, however, are tremendously exciting in the same way that the best on-campus programs are tremendously exciting. There are different things that can be done. We wanted to give a forum for people who do this incredibly well to show other faculty how to really make an impact.”
REMOTE, Hosted by ASU: A Familiar Event in an Unfamiliar Setting
“Fifteen years ago, I’d explored virtual conferences,” Levin said. Before McGraw-Hill, he also led UBM, a London-based B2B event organizer. “I said, ‘Look, I know virtual conference technology works. This isn’t Zoom. It can do all the things people are familiar with. It allows for chance, serendipity, a multi-track environment, live Q&A, and all the things you’d expect from a live event.”
Levin also knew that, for REMOTE to work, it had to be available to educators at no cost. He and his team quickly found broad support from both private and philanthropic organizations. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Pearson signed on early. ASU agreed to host in a non-promotional capacity.
“I’m very grateful to the sponsors who stepped up and allowed us to make a difference here,” Levin said.
The Structure of the Conference
REMOTE is broadly intended for educators and administrators. Over the course of two days, it will feature dozens of 30 minute sessions. Each will entail a fifteen minute presentation followed by fifteen minutes of Q&A.
These presentations will fall into three general tracks. The first might be described as gen-ed remote teaching strategies. It will focus on topics that are universal to remote instruction, like boosting learner engagement, socializing online, or creating an inclusive remote environment.
The second is subject-specific and will delve into the nuances present within an individual field of study. Chemistry instructors will present to and for chemistry instructors, as will literature instructors and psychology, etc.
The third track involves broader ‘unconference’ sessions. One or two experts will make themselves available to engage in a general, unstructured conversation with attendees.
“People will be familiar with an unfamiliar concept,” Levin said. “This is a virtual conference. It’s not a webinar. It’s not Zoom. There is interaction. There is Q&A. It’s designed to support faculty deliver a better back-to-school experience for students. That’s the only objective. So we’d encourage people to sign up and come along.”
Stakeholders can register to attend here at no cost.
Media courtesy of ASU.
I am a former summit learning teacher in Holyoke, MA. I can tell you, unequivocally, that the entire platform stinks. It is not even a curriculum, it is a hodgepodge resources lifted from Khan Academy, youtube, Engage NY, IXL lessons, scanned textbook pages, and other unrelated sources. These materials are often not aligned to common core standards, they are often of poor quality, they include numerous broken links. Students are expected to independently take notes as they work, but no consideration has been given to the lexile levels of readings so the material is often completely inaccessible to students. The math curriculum is devoid of any meaningful direct instruction. Many students disengage within a couple of weeks and spend most of their time browsing the internet or gaming instead of learning. As they fall behind, they see their home screen turn more and more red, causing greater frustration and discouragement. Students become so screen addicted that they rebel any time a teacher attempts to give them direct instruction. Worse yet, the necessity of teacher training in the platform’s usage necessitates the hiring of several consultants and coaches, many of whom explicitly state that their primary objective is to prove the platform viable so that it may grow to more school districts. Ultimately, school administrators are pressured to increase scores of online tests (many of which students attempt literally dozens of times over), so they pressure teachers to take tests with their students to ensure a passing grade. Essentially, schools are falsifying data to ensure Summit’s growth. Given that Summit pitches its product as a turnaround model for struggling urban schools, its practices are essentially exploitative.